Women as Major Group. Document of the Women's Caucus for the UNECE
Ministerial Meeting for the World Summit on Sustainable Development, Geneva
24 September 2001.
We women form a significant proportion of the workforce and sustain the majority
of households and communities. We are consumers and producers, and make many relevant
decisions. However, the socio-economic positions of women are not equal to those
of men; and our perspectives, knowledge and vi-sions are not adequately taken
into account. Therefore the implementation of the measures articulated in chapter
24 of Agenda 21: 'Global Action for Women towards Sustainable and Equitable Development'
is still relevant. This
includes ratification and implementation of all legal frameworks, such as the
Con-vention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women
(CEDAW) and its additional Protocols, the Beijing Platform for Action and the
Beijing +5 Document, as well as the provision of equal access to and equal participation
of decision-making and resources.
In every corner of the world women are change agents. Women of all age and
background show com-mitment, knowledge and skills to build a more sustainable
society. We want Johannesburg to be a suc-cess, and are preparing for the
World Summit - in organisations and networks, developing coalitions in
countries and regions, and working together with other major groups. For
example: in 2002 after a worldwide consultation process the Women's Action
Agenda 2002 will be presented, in which our con-cerns and priorities for
a
Healthy Planet will be outlined.
We express our deep concern about the lack of implementation of Agenda 21, as
has been shown in the Regional Assessment Report. For that governments hold
the main responsibility. There is an urgent need to act now!
Our priorities are the following:
Gender balance should be guaranteed in the (preparations for the) World
Summit on Sustainable Development. The proportion and participation of women
in all decision-making bodies related to sustainable development is of key
concern.
Gender specific analysis should be part of all decisions and legislation in
the area of (sustainable) development. In the implementation of sustainable
development at (inter)national and local levels, gender impact analysis is
essential. The process of engendering Local Agenda 21 initiatives should
be
widely supported. Gender budgeting is a promising methodology that should be
promoted. Gender disaggregated data need to be generated at all levels.
Indicators for sustainable development should be gender sensitive. We expect
our governments to include a strong gender perspective in the Ministerial
Statement of this meeting, and in the further preparations for the summit.
Peace and justice are prerequisites for sustainable development. In a world
that faces many local, regional and global conflicts, and in which lack of
understanding among people is growing, the fundamental basis for future
development and well-being is fading. Every person has the right to live in
freedom of war and all kind of violence. We stress the need to build
awareness and respect among people of all ages for the values of cultural
diversity. Peace and world citizenship education which focuses on the local,
regional and global situation should be part of any form of education. We
commit to work towards a respectful and just society, and urge our
governments to support us in that endeavour.
Military production and consumption are not only a serious impediment to
sustainable development, but the world's military systems are capable of
destroying humanity itself. We denounce the increase in military spending and
programmes, and call for a shift in favour of goals that strengthen
sustainable and humane development.
A world economic and political system that perpetuates poverty and even
widens the gap between the rich and poor, is not sustainable. All discussions
and decisions preparing for the World Summit, should work towards limiting
that gap and eradicating poverty, and should give people living in poverty
better social, economic, as well as environmental security. The rich
countries have a major responsibility in providing opportunities and
resources. There should be a major focus on women's poverty in all these
efforts, as women make up the majority of the poor. Major shifts are needed
in the dominant economic and financial system in order to favour sustainable
development for all. We support the 20/20 initiative as agreed at the
Copenhagen. The agreed objective of 0.7 % of GNP ODA should be guaranteed
by
our governments and they should meet up to the UN development goals for the
year 2015, including women's full access to education of all kinds. We
support the de-velopment of a Global Partnership for addressing poverty and
inequality as proposed by Minister for Environment and Tourism of South
Africa, and urge our governments to contribute to that initiative. All
stakeholders need to be part of developing implementation mechanisms.
Globalisation has many faces. It has offered people new opportunities and
perspectives. At the same time, it has forced all countries and people to
become part of the dominant neo-liberal economy, that is ruled by
trans-national companies, financial institutions and the push for profit.
People, in particular women, and governments loose their control over means
and systems of production and distribution of resources. Poverty increases.
We strongly oppose the privatisation of public re-sources, such as water.
Global governance for sustainable development is urgently needed. At the
World Summit a mechanism should be put in place that reviews the social and
environmental consequences of globalisation, and that introduces reforms that
benefit the poor and other vulnerable groups and that promote sustainable
development.
Health and environment are closely connected. Women's health is
particularly affected by environ-mental pollutants in the home, workplace and
neighbourhood. We stress the need to ban toxic chemicals affecting the most
vulnerable stages of human life. Women have the right to live, conceive and
give birth in an unpolluted environment. Policies and monitoring strategies
must protect all, especially the most vulnerable in society. These are
un-negotiable rights.
Everybody has the right to a fair share of natural resources of good
quality. We call on the WSSD to launch the negotiation process for a global
convention on environmental rights, based on Rio Principle 10. The ecological
footprint of many of the rich societies is far beyond the carrying capacity
of the Earth, and much larger than that of poorer countries. We must make our
production and consumption processes more energy- and resource efficient,
less polluting and safe - both in relative as well as in absolute terms. For
that clear targets should be set and worked upon. Research and technology, as
well as education and awareness raising should enhance these efforts.
Food security implies food sovereignty. People must have the choice to
decide what kind of food to produce, to consume and to import. We reject the
genetic modification of food products and patenting of life. Food security
for all is not possible within a global market system based on a free trade
market system, with its focus on permanent growth, comparative advantages,
competition and profit making. People, especially women, within their local
and regional economies should be empowered to obtain control over land and
other resources.
Much more support should be given to the promotion and development of
sustainable land-use and agricultural systems that are environmentally sound,
preserve cultural and biological diversity and offer a sustainable living to
rural families. Subsidies on unsustainable systems should be stopped.
Governments have a duty to promote actively the production of sustainable and
environmentally sound food products so that these become amply available in
the market at competitive prices.
The conservation of biological diversity and wise use of natural resources
should not only be sup-ported at global level, but also in our own countries
and region. Information on the status of eco-systems' health should
be made available to the wide public. We would like our governments and all
major groups to endorse the Earth Charter and to identify means of implementation.
Our governments should ratify and implement all international environmental
conventions and protocols, as well as national regulations, as soon as
possible. Monitoring and control systems should be an explicit part of the
implementation. The role that local communities play in monitoring the local
environmental situation, should be recognised. The precautionary principle
should direct any decision with a potential socio-environmental effect.